Files
Sauci/docs/schema.md

262 lines
8.6 KiB
Markdown

# Database Schema
## Entity Relationship Diagram
```mermaid
erDiagram
%% Core Authentication
auth_users {
uuid id PK
string email
jsonb raw_user_meta_data
}
%% User Management
profiles {
uuid id PK,FK "references auth.users"
text name
text avatar_url
text push_token
boolean is_premium
uuid couple_id FK
timestamptz created_at
timestamptz updated_at
}
couples {
uuid id PK
text invite_code UK
timestamptz created_at
}
%% Content
question_packs {
uuid id PK
text name
text description
text icon
boolean is_premium
boolean is_public
content_review_status content_status "allowed required for customer access"
int sort_order
timestamptz created_at
}
questions {
uuid id PK
uuid pack_id FK
text text
text partner_text "for two-part questions"
text question_type "swipe/text_answer/audio/photo/who_likely"
jsonb config "type-specific configuration"
int intensity "1-5"
text[] allowed_couple_genders "couple composition filter"
text[] target_user_genders "individual user filter"
text[] required_props "props/accessories required"
content_review_status content_status "allowed required for customer access"
timestamptz created_at
}
%% Couple Pack Selection
couple_packs {
uuid couple_id PK,FK
uuid pack_id PK,FK
boolean enabled
timestamptz created_at
}
%% User Interaction
responses {
uuid id PK
uuid user_id FK
uuid question_id FK
uuid couple_id FK "nullable: null is a sealed solo answer, claimed at pairing"
answer_type answer "yes/no/maybe"
jsonb response_data "non-swipe answer payload"
timestamptz created_at
}
matches {
uuid id PK
uuid couple_id FK
uuid question_id FK
match_type match_type "yes_yes/yes_maybe/maybe_maybe/both_answered"
jsonb response_summary "both non-swipe payloads by user"
boolean is_new
timestamptz created_at
}
messages {
uuid id PK
uuid match_id FK
uuid user_id FK
text content
text media_path
timestamptz read_at
timestamptz created_at
}
%% Subscriptions
subscriptions {
uuid id PK
uuid user_id FK
text revenuecat_app_user_id
text product_id
subscription_status status
text[] entitlement_ids
timestamptz purchased_at
timestamptz expires_at
text original_transaction_id
text store
boolean is_sandbox
text cancel_reason
timestamptz grace_period_expires_at
timestamptz created_at
timestamptz updated_at
}
revenuecat_webhook_events {
uuid id PK
text event_id UK
text event_type
text app_user_id
timestamptz processed_at
jsonb payload
}
%% Feedback
feedback {
uuid id PK
uuid user_id FK
feedback_type type "bug/feature_request/general"
text title
text description
text screenshot_url
jsonb device_info
feedback_status status
text admin_notes
timestamptz created_at
timestamptz updated_at
}
%% Relationships
auth_users ||--|| profiles : "extends"
couples ||--o{ profiles : "has members"
couples ||--o{ couple_packs : "selects packs"
couples ||--o{ responses : "has responses"
couples ||--o{ matches : "has matches"
question_packs ||--o{ questions : "contains"
question_packs ||--o{ couple_packs : "selected by"
questions ||--o{ responses : "answered by"
questions ||--o{ matches : "generates"
profiles ||--o{ responses : "submits"
profiles ||--o{ feedback : "submits"
profiles ||--o{ subscriptions : "has"
matches ||--o{ messages : "has chat"
auth_users ||--o{ messages : "sends"
```
## Enums
| Enum | Values |
|------|--------|
| `answer_type` | `yes`, `no`, `maybe` |
| `question_type` | `swipe`, `text_answer`, `audio`, `photo`, `who_likely` |
| `match_type` | `yes_yes`, `yes_maybe`, `maybe_maybe`, `both_answered` |
| `feedback_type` | `bug`, `feature_request`, `general` |
| `feedback_status` | `new`, `reviewed`, `in_progress`, `resolved`, `closed` |
| `subscription_status` | `active`, `cancelled`, `expired`, `billing_issue`, `paused` |
| `content_review_status` | `unreviewed`, `allowed`, `archived` |
| `content_entity_type` | `categories`, `question_packs`, `questions`, `dare_packs`, `dares` |
## Catalogue review metadata
`categories`, `question_packs`, `questions`, `dare_packs`, and `dares` carry
`content_status`, `content_review_reason`, `content_reviewed_at`, and
`content_reviewed_by`. Insert triggers force new rows to `unreviewed` with empty
review metadata even when a caller supplies forged values. Status changes and
same-status re-reviews require a non-blank reason, only super-admin users may
make an authenticated decision, reviewer identity/time are database-managed,
and visible content edits reset an unchanged decision to `unreviewed`.
`content_reviews` is the append-only status-change history. Only super-admins
may read it through the authenticated API. Customer catalogue RLS and the legacy
recommendation/teaser RPCs fail closed: a category, pack, and question or dare
must all be `allowed`. `unreviewed` and `archived` content remains available to
administrators but is not returned to customer clients. Service-role response
functions independently reject questions unless both question and pack are
allowed.
## Key Flows
### Question interactions
`questions.question_type` defaults to `swipe`; `questions.config` holds
type-specific settings. A non-swipe response keeps its payload in
`responses.response_data`. When a non-swipe interaction resolves as
`both_answered`, `matches.response_summary` holds both payloads keyed by user
ID. The complete interaction and match contract is maintained in
[Question interaction types](question-types.md).
### Response & Match Flow
1. User submits a response to the standalone API at `POST /v1/responses`
2. Response saved to `responses` table (UPSERT on `user_id, question_id`)
3. API checks for the partner's response on the same question
4. API applies the [question interaction contract](question-types.md) to create,
update, or remove a `match`
5. Match triggers push notification to both partners
6. Match unlocks chat thread in `messages` table
Without a couple yet, step 3 has no partner response to check: the response is
saved with `couple_id IS NULL` (a sealed answer) and no match is created. See
[Solo answering and sealed answers](couple-pairing.md#solo-answering-and-sealed-answers).
### Couple Pairing Flow
1. First user creates couple, gets `invite_code`
2. Second user joins via `manage-couple` edge function with invite code
3. Both profiles' `couple_id` set to same couple
4. Every sealed answer (`couple_id IS NULL`) belonging to either member is
claimed into the couple, and matches are computed for every question both
members have now answered
### Pack Selection Flow
1. Couples can enable/disable packs via `couple_packs` junction table
2. `get_recommended_questions()` filters by enabled packs and the universal
allowed-content boundary
3. Two-part questions show `partner_text` to second responder
### Question Targeting System
Questions can be targeted at specific audiences using two complementary filters:
| Field | Purpose | Level | Example |
|-------|---------|-------|---------|
| `allowed_couple_genders` | Couple composition filter | Couple | `['male+female', 'female+female']` |
| `target_user_genders` | Individual user filter | User | `['female', 'non-binary']` |
**How targeting works:**
1. **Couple filter** (`allowed_couple_genders`): Questions only shown to couples matching the composition (e.g., same-sex specific questions)
2. **User filter** (`target_user_genders`): Controls who sees the question **as initiator** (first responder)
- If user's gender matches → they can see and answer first
- If user's gender doesn't match → they only see it after partner answers (via `partner_text`)
**Example flow:**
```
Question:
text: "Have your partner suck your tits"
partner_text: "Suck your partner's tits"
target_user_genders: ['female']
1. Female sees "Have your partner suck your tits" → swipes YES
2. Male sees "Suck your partner's tits" (partner_text, unlocked by her answer)
3. Both answered → Match created!
```
This ensures gender-appropriate phrasing while still allowing both partners to respond.