Add MCP server and enhance AI content tools

Implement self-hosted MCP server for admin actions, update AI generation tools in admin dashboard, and refine mobile app stores and components.
This commit is contained in:
jjbrunton committed 2026-01-10 19:24:06 +00:00
1 parent b0f1700e40
commit 4e40b92b16
71 files changed
+10511 -1008

No files matched your search

+121 -55
View File
@@ -39,47 +39,68 @@ export async function reviewGeneratedQuestions(
intensity: q.intensity,
location_type: q.location_type,
effort_level: q.effort_level,
// Include targeting for review (may not always be present)
allowed_couple_genders: (q as { allowed_couple_genders?: string[] | null }).allowed_couple_genders || null,
target_user_genders: (q as { target_user_genders?: string[] | null }).target_user_genders || null,
}));
const toneDescription = TONE_LEVELS.find(t => t.level === packContext.tone)?.label || 'Unknown';
const prompt = `You are a quality reviewer for a couples intimacy app. Review each generated question against our guidelines.
const prompt = `<task>
Review each generated question against our quality guidelines.
</task>
PACK CONTEXT:
<pack_context>
- Pack Name: "${packContext.name}"
${packContext.description ? `- Pack Description: "${packContext.description}"` : ''}
- Content Type: ${packContext.isExplicit ? 'EXPLICIT (adult content allowed)' : 'NON-EXPLICIT (clean/romantic only)'}
- Tone Level: ${packContext.tone} (${toneDescription})
</pack_context>
<scoring_criteria>
${REVIEW_GUIDELINES}
</scoring_criteria>
VERDICT RULES:
<verdict_rules>
- PASS: All scores >= 7, no major issues
- FLAG: Any score 5-7, or minor issues worth noting (admin should review but can use)
- REJECT: Any score < 5, or major violations (mixed anatomy, wrong intensity, severe guideline violation)
</verdict_rules>
QUESTIONS TO REVIEW:
<questions_to_review>
${JSON.stringify(questionsForReview, null, 2)}
</questions_to_review>
Return a JSON object with:
<output_format>
{
"reviews": [
{
"index": 0,
"verdict": "pass" | "flag" | "reject",
"issues": ["Issue 1", "Issue 2"],
"suggestions": "Optional improvement suggestion",
"index": number, // 0-based index of the question
"verdict": "pass"|"flag"|"reject",
"issues": string[], // List of issues found, empty if none
"suggestions": string|null, // Optional improvement suggestion
"scores": {
"guidelineCompliance": 8,
"creativity": 7,
"clarity": 9,
"intensityAccuracy": 8
}
"guidelineCompliance": 1-10, // Criterion 1
"creativity": 1-10, // Criterion 2
"clarity": 1-10, // Criterion 3
"intensityAccuracy": 1-10, // Criterion 4
"anatomicalConsistency": 1-10, // Criterion 5
"partnerTextQuality": 1-10, // Criterion 6 (10 if no partner_text needed)
"coupleTargeting": 1-10, // Criterion 7
"initiatorTargeting": 1-10 // Criterion 8 (10 if symmetric)
},
"intensitySuggestion": number|null, // Suggested intensity (1-5) if current seems wrong, null if correct
"targetingSuggestions": { // Only include if targeting needs changes
"suggestedCoupleTargets": string[]|null, // ["male+male", "female+male", "female+female"] or subset
"suggestedInitiator": string[]|null, // ["male", "female"] or null for any
"reason": string // Why targeting should change
}|null
}
]
}
Review ALL questions. Be thorough but fair - only flag/reject for genuine issues.`;
Review ALL questions against ALL 8 criteria. Be thorough but fair - only flag/reject for genuine issues.
</output_format>`;
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
model: config.reviewerModel,
@@ -91,7 +112,7 @@ Review ALL questions. Be thorough but fair - only flag/reject for genuine issues
{ role: 'user', content: prompt },
],
response_format: { type: 'json_object' },
temperature: 0.3,
temperature: config.reviewerTemperature ?? 0.3,
});
const content = response.choices[0].message.content;
@@ -111,19 +132,31 @@ Review ALL questions. Be thorough but fair - only flag/reject for genuine issues
const flagged = reviews.filter(r => r.verdict === 'flag').length;
const rejected = reviews.filter(r => r.verdict === 'reject').length;
// Calculate overall quality as average of all scores
let totalScore = 0;
let scoreCount = 0;
// Calculate overall quality as weighted average of all 8 scores
// Weights: guidelineCompliance 20%, creativity 15%, clarity 15%, intensityAccuracy 15%,
// anatomicalConsistency 15%, partnerTextQuality 10%, coupleTargeting 5%, initiatorTargeting 5%
let totalWeightedScore = 0;
let totalWeight = 0;
const weights = {
guidelineCompliance: 0.20,
creativity: 0.15,
clarity: 0.15,
intensityAccuracy: 0.15,
anatomicalConsistency: 0.15,
partnerTextQuality: 0.10,
coupleTargeting: 0.05,
initiatorTargeting: 0.05,
};
for (const review of reviews) {
if (review.scores) {
totalScore += review.scores.guidelineCompliance || 0;
totalScore += review.scores.creativity || 0;
totalScore += review.scores.clarity || 0;
totalScore += review.scores.intensityAccuracy || 0;
scoreCount += 4;
for (const [key, weight] of Object.entries(weights)) {
const score = review.scores[key as keyof typeof review.scores] || 0;
totalWeightedScore += score * weight;
totalWeight += weight;
}
}
}
const overallQuality = scoreCount > 0 ? Math.round((totalScore / scoreCount) * 10) / 10 : 0;
const overallQuality = totalWeight > 0 ? Math.round((totalWeightedScore / (totalWeight / Object.keys(weights).length)) * 10) / 10 : 0;
return {
reviews,
@@ -168,54 +201,77 @@ export async function selectBestGeneration(
text: q.text,
partner_text: q.partner_text || null,
intensity: q.intensity,
allowed_couple_genders: (q as { allowed_couple_genders?: string[] | null }).allowed_couple_genders || null,
target_user_genders: (q as { target_user_genders?: string[] | null }).target_user_genders || null,
})),
}));
const prompt = `You are a quality reviewer for a couples intimacy app. You have received ${candidates.length} different sets of generated questions from different AI models. Your task is to:
const prompt = `<task>
Compare ${candidates.length} different sets of generated questions from different AI models. Select the best set and review it in detail.
</task>
<objectives>
1. COMPARE all sets and SELECT the BEST one overall
2. REVIEW the selected set in detail
</objectives>
PACK CONTEXT:
<pack_context>
- Pack Name: "${packContext.name}"
${packContext.description ? `- Pack Description: "${packContext.description}"` : ''}
- Content Type: ${packContext.isExplicit ? 'EXPLICIT (adult content allowed)' : 'NON-EXPLICIT (clean/romantic only)'}
- Tone Level: ${packContext.tone} (${toneDescription})
</pack_context>
<scoring_criteria>
${REVIEW_GUIDELINES}
</scoring_criteria>
CANDIDATE SETS:
<candidate_sets>
${JSON.stringify(candidatesForReview, null, 2)}
</candidate_sets>
SELECTION CRITERIA (in order of importance):
1. Overall quality and creativity of questions
2. Variety and uniqueness within the set
3. Adherence to pack theme and tone
4. Proper intensity grading
5. Correct use of "your partner" language
6. Quality of partner_text for asymmetric questions
<selection_criteria>
Ranked by importance (approximate weights):
1. Overall quality and creativity of questions (30%)
2. Variety and uniqueness within the set (20%)
3. Adherence to pack theme and tone (20%)
4. Proper intensity grading (15%)
5. Correct use of "your partner" language (10%)
6. Quality of partner_text for asymmetric questions (5%)
</selection_criteria>
Return a JSON object with:
<output_format>
{
"selectedIndex": <0-based index of the best candidate set>,
"reasoning": "<brief explanation of why this set was chosen>",
"selectedIndex": number, // 0-based index of the best candidate set
"reasoning": string, // Brief explanation of why this set was chosen
"reviews": [
{
"index": <question index within selected set>,
"verdict": "pass" | "flag" | "reject",
"issues": ["Issue 1", "Issue 2"],
"suggestions": "Optional improvement suggestion",
"index": number, // Question index within selected set
"verdict": "pass"|"flag"|"reject",
"issues": string[],
"suggestions": string|null,
"scores": {
"guidelineCompliance": 1-10,
"creativity": 1-10,
"clarity": 1-10,
"intensityAccuracy": 1-10
}
"intensityAccuracy": 1-10,
"anatomicalConsistency": 1-10,
"partnerTextQuality": 1-10,
"coupleTargeting": 1-10,
"initiatorTargeting": 1-10
},
"intensitySuggestion": number|null,
"targetingSuggestions": {
"suggestedCoupleTargets": string[]|null,
"suggestedInitiator": string[]|null,
"reason": string
}|null
}
]
}
Select the best set and review ALL questions in that set.`;
Select the best set and review ALL questions in that set against ALL 8 criteria.
</output_format>`;
const response = await openai.chat.completions.create({
model: config.reviewerModel,
@@ -227,7 +283,7 @@ Select the best set and review ALL questions in that set.`;
{ role: 'user', content: prompt },
],
response_format: { type: 'json_object' },
temperature: 0.3,
temperature: config.reviewerTemperature ?? 0.3,
});
const content = response.choices[0].message.content;
@@ -244,23 +300,33 @@ Select the best set and review ALL questions in that set.`;
const reviews: QuestionReview[] = parsed.reviews || [];
const reasoning = parsed.reasoning || 'No reasoning provided';
// Calculate summary
// Calculate summary with weighted average of all 8 scores
const passed = reviews.filter(r => r.verdict === 'pass').length;
const flagged = reviews.filter(r => r.verdict === 'flag').length;
const rejected = reviews.filter(r => r.verdict === 'reject').length;
let totalScore = 0;
let scoreCount = 0;
let totalWeightedScore = 0;
let totalWeight = 0;
const weights = {
guidelineCompliance: 0.20,
creativity: 0.15,
clarity: 0.15,
intensityAccuracy: 0.15,
anatomicalConsistency: 0.15,
partnerTextQuality: 0.10,
coupleTargeting: 0.05,
initiatorTargeting: 0.05,
};
for (const review of reviews) {
if (review.scores) {
totalScore += review.scores.guidelineCompliance || 0;
totalScore += review.scores.creativity || 0;
totalScore += review.scores.clarity || 0;
totalScore += review.scores.intensityAccuracy || 0;
scoreCount += 4;
for (const [key, weight] of Object.entries(weights)) {
const score = review.scores[key as keyof typeof review.scores] || 0;
totalWeightedScore += score * weight;
totalWeight += weight;
}
}
}
const overallQuality = scoreCount > 0 ? Math.round((totalScore / scoreCount) * 10) / 10 : 0;
const overallQuality = totalWeight > 0 ? Math.round((totalWeightedScore / (totalWeight / Object.keys(weights).length)) * 10) / 10 : 0;
return {
selectedIndex,