268 lines
13 KiB
YAML
268 lines
13 KiB
YAML
reddit:
|
||
# Weights bias how often each sub is picked each poll cycle. Higher weight
|
||
# = more likely to appear earlier in the check order. Initial weights favor
|
||
# subs where low-confidence / validation-seeking posters concentrate
|
||
# (rating subs, "average"/mature/plus subs) since they tend to have higher
|
||
# DM reply rates. Default is 1 if omitted.
|
||
subreddits:
|
||
# Validation-seeking / lower-confidence (highest weight)
|
||
- { name: AverageNudes, weight: 4, tone: 'direct' } # "Average-looking" self-perception
|
||
- { name: gonewild40plus, weight: 4, tone: 'gentle' } # Mature, lower volume, very high reply rate
|
||
- { name: normalnudes, weight: 3 } # Everyday real bodies
|
||
- { name: RateMyNudeBody, weight: 3, tone: 'direct' } # Explicit ask for feedback
|
||
- { name: ratemyboobs, weight: 3, tone: 'direct' } # Rating subs = explicit validation-seeking
|
||
- { name: ratemypussy, weight: 3, tone: 'direct' }
|
||
- { name: cnc_freaks, weight: 4, tone: 'kink-friendly' }
|
||
- { name: traumatizedsluts2, weight: 4, tone: 'kink-friendly' }
|
||
- { name: RateMyRack, weight: 3, tone: 'direct' }
|
||
- { name: GoneWildPlus, weight: 3, tone: 'gentle' } # BBW/plus-size
|
||
- { name: gonewildchubby, weight: 3, tone: 'gentle' } # Soft/chubby bodies
|
||
- { name: gonewild30plus, weight: 2, tone: 'gentle' } # Mature/MILF amateurs
|
||
- { name: GoneMild, weight: 2, tone: 'gentle' } # Softcore teases (shyer posters)
|
||
|
||
# Mid-tier — mixed confidence
|
||
- { name: GoneWildCurvy, weight: 2 }
|
||
- { name: HomemadeNsfw, weight: 2 }
|
||
- { name: realgirlsgonebad, weight: 2, tone: 'dominant' }
|
||
- { name: nsfwselfies, weight: 2 }
|
||
- { name: RealGirls, weight: 2 }
|
||
- { name: Amateur, weight: 2 }
|
||
|
||
# Baseline — generally more confident / curated posters
|
||
- { name: gonewild, weight: 1 } # #1 verified self-posters
|
||
- { name: GoneErotic, weight: 1 }
|
||
- { name: OnOff, weight: 1 }
|
||
- { name: petitegonewild, weight: 1 }
|
||
- { name: tightandtoned, weight: 1 }
|
||
- { name: pawg, weight: 1 }
|
||
- { name: asiansgonewild, weight: 1 }
|
||
- { name: altgonewild, weight: 1 }
|
||
- { name: holdthemoan, weight: 1 }
|
||
|
||
# Chat-only subreddits — no image analysis, gender parsed from post tag
|
||
#
|
||
pollIntervalMs: 30000
|
||
userAgent: "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/131.0.0.0 Safari/537.36"
|
||
targetGenders:
|
||
- female # Options: male, female, other, unknown
|
||
filterSellers: true # Skip profiles that appear to be OnlyFans/content sellers
|
||
prioritizeRecentPosts: true # Prefer posts within recentWindowMinutes; older posts only as fallback
|
||
recentWindowMinutes: 30
|
||
# sellerKeywords: [...] # Uncomment to override default keyword list
|
||
|
||
openrouter:
|
||
imageAnalysisModel: "google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite"
|
||
imageAnalysisFallbackModels:
|
||
- "meta-llama/llama-4-maverick"
|
||
- "x-ai/grok-4.1-fast"
|
||
- "google/gemini-3-flash-preview"
|
||
chatModel: "qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507"
|
||
# Tried in order if the primary chatModel throws, returns empty, or refuses.
|
||
# All known-good frontier models, NSFW-tolerant, ordered cheap → premium
|
||
# (avg cost per 1M tokens shown). Avoid Gemini/OpenAI/Claude here — they
|
||
# silently refuse explicit content.
|
||
chatFallbackModels:
|
||
- "deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash" # ~$0.17/M
|
||
- "meta-llama/llama-4-scout" # ~$0.19/M
|
||
- "meta-llama/llama-4-maverick" # ~$0.38/M
|
||
- "deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3.1" # ~$0.50/M
|
||
imageAnalysisPrompt: |
|
||
Analyze this adult image using only directly visible evidence.
|
||
|
||
Strict grounding rules:
|
||
- Never infer, predict, or imagine obscured anatomy, off-frame body parts,
|
||
hidden details, or how something would look in another pose.
|
||
- Do not infer overall body type from a close crop.
|
||
- If something is covered, cropped out, or ambiguous, mark it NOT_VISIBLE
|
||
or UNCERTAIN.
|
||
- Explicit language does not permit inference. Never mention pussy unless
|
||
external genital detail is directly visible.
|
||
|
||
Use exactly this structure:
|
||
VISIBLE_FACTS:
|
||
BREASTS: VISIBLE|NOT_VISIBLE|UNCERTAIN - directly visible details only
|
||
ASS: VISIBLE|NOT_VISIBLE|UNCERTAIN - directly visible details only
|
||
VAGINA: VISIBLE|NOT_VISIBLE|UNCERTAIN - directly visible details only
|
||
BODY: VISIBLE|NOT_VISIBLE|UNCERTAIN - directly visible details only
|
||
POSE: directly visible posture only
|
||
VIBE: only expressions or eye contact directly visible; otherwise UNCERTAIN
|
||
EXTRAS: directly visible clothing, tattoos, piercings, toys, and setting only
|
||
|
||
EXPLICIT_HOOKS:
|
||
- Give 1 to 3 short, blunt adult phrases derived only from VISIBLE_FACTS.
|
||
- Use everyday words such as tits, nipples, ass, or pussy when the
|
||
corresponding anatomy is directly visible.
|
||
- Never mention hidden breasts, nipples, ass, or pussy.
|
||
- Do not add new visual claims or predictions.
|
||
|
||
Then rate her attractiveness on a 1-100 scale using these percentile anchors:
|
||
- 30 = noticeably below average
|
||
- 50 = average woman you'd pass on the street (this is the true middle, NOT a "low" score)
|
||
- 65 = cute, above average, decent body
|
||
- 75 = clearly hot, turns heads
|
||
- 85 = exceptional, model-tier face/body
|
||
- 95+ = vanishingly rare, top fraction of a percent
|
||
Use the full range. Real people are distributed across this scale — most photos in this dataset fall between 40 and 80. Do NOT cluster scores in the 65-75 band as a safe default. If you feel pulled toward 70, decide whether she's actually closer to 60 or 80 and commit. A score that ends in 0 or 5 is a red flag that you're rounding to a comfort number — prefer a specific number like 47, 63, 78.
|
||
|
||
Output the rating on its own line in EXACTLY this format (before or after the description):
|
||
RATING:<number>
|
||
Then on the next line: REASON:<one sentence explaining the score>
|
||
|
||
Be critical and honest. Keep the complete response under 300 words.
|
||
messageGenerationPrompt: |
|
||
Based on this image analysis: {analysis}
|
||
Post title: {title}
|
||
Author: u/{author}
|
||
Post flair: {flair}
|
||
|
||
Attractiveness rating (1-100 scale, 50 = average): {rating}
|
||
If the rating is below 60, lean harder into making her feel sexy and desired — emphasize how hot her pic looks. If the rating is 75+, you can be more confidently flirty without overdoing the flattery.
|
||
|
||
Write a casual Reddit DM (1-3 short sentences) like a horny guy reacting naturally to her post.
|
||
|
||
MUST follow:
|
||
- Start sentences with capital letters, use proper capitalisation
|
||
- Use explicit terms: tits, ass, pussy, boobs (NOT breasts, buttocks, etc)
|
||
- Reference something SPECIFIC from the analysis (her tits, ass, pussy, body, pose)
|
||
- Be direct and confident, not flowery or poetic
|
||
- Follow the selected STYLE exactly, especially its required opening and ending shape
|
||
- Make the message feel materially different from the recent messages supplied below
|
||
|
||
POSSIBLE HOOKS (only when the selected STYLE calls for one):
|
||
- A specific question about the post
|
||
- A playful prediction or challenge
|
||
- A conditional invitation to share something else
|
||
- A statement of desire with no question
|
||
|
||
BAD HOOKS:
|
||
- "How's your day?"
|
||
- "What are you up to?"
|
||
- Generic small talk questions
|
||
- "Tell me about yourself"
|
||
|
||
DO NOT:
|
||
- Sound like an AI or formal writing
|
||
- Use words like "captivating", "alluring", "exquisite", "radiant", "prominent"
|
||
- Use clinical terms like "breasts", "buttocks", "posterior", "physique"
|
||
- Write long elaborate sentences
|
||
- Use all lowercase
|
||
- Default to opening with "Damn", "Wow", "Holy shit", or the same reaction used recently
|
||
- Default to closing with "Got any more pics?", "More please", or a near-copy of a recent closing
|
||
- Use em dashes (—) or en dashes (–). Use commas, full stops, or separate sentences instead. This is a dead giveaway for AI writing.
|
||
|
||
Just write the message, nothing else.
|
||
|
||
chatOpenerPrompt: |
|
||
You are writing a cold opener DM to a Reddit user who posted in a chat/sexting subreddit looking for someone to chat with.
|
||
|
||
Post title: {title}
|
||
Post body: {selftext}
|
||
Author: u/{author}
|
||
Detected gender of poster: {gender}
|
||
Post flair: {flair}
|
||
|
||
YOUR PERSONA:
|
||
- You are male, based in the UK, pick a random age between 30 and 35 for this message
|
||
- Roughly half the time, mention (or imply) you're married/have a wife and are looking for something on the side; the other half, don't mention relationship status at all
|
||
- Don't force the married angle if their post wouldn't vibe with it, read the room
|
||
- Use British English spelling and phrasing (e.g. "mate", "knackered", "fancy", "cheeky") where it feels natural, not forced
|
||
|
||
Write a casual Reddit DM (1-2 sentences) opening a chat.
|
||
|
||
MUST follow:
|
||
- Include your age/gender/location naturally, but place it where the selected STYLE requires
|
||
- Reference something SPECIFIC from their title/body (their mood, what they're into, vibe, age, location)
|
||
- Be confident and direct, flirty but not creepy
|
||
- Use proper capitalisation, no AI/clinical language
|
||
- End with a hook that invites a reply (ask them what they're into, offer something playful)
|
||
|
||
DO NOT:
|
||
- Use words like "captivating", "alluring", "intriguing"
|
||
- Open with "Hey there" / "How's your day"
|
||
- Write more than 2 sentences
|
||
- Be generic, "wanna chat?" alone is too weak
|
||
- Reuse the opening words, sentence pattern, or closing question from a recent message
|
||
- Claim to be a different age/gender than the persona above
|
||
- Use em dashes (—) or en dashes (–) anywhere in the message. Use commas, full stops, or separate sentences instead. This is a dead giveaway for AI writing.
|
||
|
||
Just write the message, nothing else.
|
||
|
||
strategies:
|
||
explorationRate: 0.2 # 20% of the time try a random strategy instead of the best
|
||
minSamples: 20 # Mature outcomes required before exploiting a strategy
|
||
responseWindowHours: 12 # Age unanswered sends before including them in strategy performance
|
||
variants:
|
||
- id: reaction_statement
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: REACTION STATEMENT. Open with a short physical reaction that is NOT "Damn", "Wow", or "Holy shit".
|
||
Mention one specific visible detail. Finish with a confident statement of desire, not a question and not a request for more.
|
||
- id: question_first
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: QUESTION FIRST. The very first sentence must be a specific, answerable question about her post, pose, outfit, or title.
|
||
Follow with one concise explicit compliment. Do not ask whether she has more pics.
|
||
- id: title_callback
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: TITLE CALLBACK. Open by naturally echoing or answering the post title, without quoting it verbatim.
|
||
Turn that callback into a playful compliment. End with an optional, conditional invitation rather than a generic request.
|
||
- id: teasing_challenge
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: TEASING CHALLENGE. Open with a playful assumption, prediction, or mild challenge based on one visible detail.
|
||
Do not open with a compliment. End with a short dare or question that is specific to the challenge.
|
||
- id: concise_observation
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: CONCISE OBSERVATION. Write exactly one sentence about the most distinctive visible detail in the analysis.
|
||
Do not ask a question, request more content, or begin with an interjection.
|
||
- id: imagined_scenario
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: IMAGINED SCENARIO. Open with a brief, concrete scenario inspired by the pose or setting, then say what it makes you want.
|
||
End on the scenario itself. Do not use a generic compliment opener or ask "got more?".
|
||
|
||
chatStrategies:
|
||
explorationRate: 0.2
|
||
minSamples: 20
|
||
responseWindowHours: 12
|
||
variants:
|
||
- id: chat_identity_first
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: IDENTITY FIRST. Open with your age/gender/location tag, then make one specific reference to their post and ask one answerable question.
|
||
- id: chat_question_first
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: QUESTION FIRST. Open with a specific question prompted by their title or body. Put your age/gender/location naturally in the second sentence.
|
||
- id: chat_post_callback
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: POST CALLBACK. Open by responding to a distinctive phrase, request, or mood from their post. Add your age/gender/location later and close with a playful offer.
|
||
- id: chat_playful_assumption
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: PLAYFUL ASSUMPTION. Start with a light, post-specific assumption about the kind of chat or trouble they want. Include your identity naturally and end with a mild challenge.
|
||
- id: chat_mirror_statement
|
||
weight: 1
|
||
promptOverride: |
|
||
STYLE: MIRROR STATEMENT. Match their energy and vocabulary, then make a direct statement about why you fit what they asked for. Include your identity, but do not end with a question.
|
||
|
||
rateLimit:
|
||
minDelayBetweenMessagesMs: 15000
|
||
maxMessagesPerHour: 9999
|
||
jitterMs: 60000
|
||
|
||
browser:
|
||
sessionDir: "./data/browser-session"
|
||
headless: true
|
||
dryRun: false # Set to false to actually send messages
|
||
|
||
database:
|
||
path: "./data/reddit-bot.db"
|
||
|
||
web:
|
||
enabled: true
|
||
port: 3000
|