Persist comment source monitoring
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
5e1fc5def9
commit
8d932fcf36
16 files changed
+376
-24
No files matched your search
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Configured subreddits have a source type:
|
||||
- `image`: image-led posts are downloaded and analyzed before an opener is generated.
|
||||
- `chat`: text-led posts require a parseable self-declared gender and adult age, then use the chat-opener prompt.
|
||||
|
||||
Image subreddits may separately target either the post author (the default) or a qualifying commenter. Comment-author targeting scans a bounded set of top-level comments on newly listed image posts and uses a fail-closed AI classification. A comment qualifies only when it personally expresses a desire to receive or experience the depicted person's role; describing what the commenter would do to the pictured person does not qualify. Confidence must be at least 0.8, and the gender perspective expressed by the comment must be included in `reddit.targetGenders` when that list is non-empty. `unknown` therefore fails closed unless it is explicitly targeted. The normal image screen also verifies that the depicted role matches `reddit.targetGenders`. The comment verdict is an interpretation of public text, not a claim about the author's actual gender or identity. Generic praise, ambiguous reactions, deleted/moderator comments, and the post author's own comments do not qualify. The original image remains scene context, but commenter openers use a separate prompt contract and must ground the message in what the commenter expressed. Drafts fail closed when they attribute the pictured body, pose, post, or image to the commenter, request another image, or omit a clear connection to the comment.
|
||||
Image subreddits may separately target either the post author (the default) or a qualifying commenter. Comment-author targeting durably watches newly listed image posts throughout the configured recent window and checks their newest comments in rotation, rather than treating a source post as finished after one pass. A comment qualifies only when it personally expresses a desire to receive or experience the depicted person's role; describing what the commenter would do to the pictured person does not qualify. Confidence must be at least 0.8, and the gender perspective expressed by the comment must be included in `reddit.targetGenders` when that list is non-empty. `unknown` therefore fails closed unless it is explicitly targeted. The normal image screen also verifies that the depicted role matches `reddit.targetGenders`. The comment verdict is an interpretation of public text, not a claim about the author's actual gender or identity. Generic praise, ambiguous reactions, deleted/moderator comments, and the post author's own comments do not qualify. The original image remains scene context, but commenter openers use a separate prompt contract and must ground the message in what the commenter expressed. Drafts fail closed when they attribute the pictured body, pose, post, or image to the commenter, request another image, or omit a clear connection to the comment.
|
||||
|
||||
Image analysis may produce a subjective 1–10 visible-physique score. It is not a medical assessment and remains unknown when the image does not show enough of the body for a grounded judgment. The scale is deliberately critical: 5 is broadly average, 6 requires visible above-average leanness or definition, and 8–10 are reserved for rare athletic or model-like physiques. Nudity and photographic presentation do not increase the score. Physique targeting is disabled by default. When an operator enables an inclusive minimum/maximum range, image candidates outside that range—and unscorable image candidates—are rejected before opener generation; chat candidates are unaffected.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user